online salon for art, news, essays, and organizing action

Category: Policies and Legislation

  • May 14 – Testify to Support Universal Healthcare: the All Maine Health Act

    May 14 – Testify to Support Universal Healthcare: the All Maine Health Act

    On Wednesday, May 14, consider testing in support of LD 1883.

    Location: Burton M. Cross Office Building Room 220, 111 Sewall St, Augusta, ME 04330
    Time: 1-2:30pm, Wednesday 5/14/25

    From Maine AllCare: “(LD 1883) will establish a publicly funded universal healthcare plan for Maine. You can testify in person, via Zoom, or submit testimony online. Any testimony highlighting the many problems with our current system will be welcome. We’re especially looking for personal stories that illustrate why we need publicly funded, universal health care. These could be stories about unavailable or inaccessible care, exorbitant costs (of care or insurance), medical debt or bankruptcy, treatment delays, or denials.

    For more information on the bill and a guide to writing testimony, check out our toolkit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fpvqbpsuo9m-J3K-w6yDSIp5pusaMU-DdrIBq7Y2iG8/edit?tab=t.0

  • Angus King’s 4/29 Speech: All Talk Backed up by No Action

    Angus King’s 4/29 Speech: All Talk Backed up by No Action

    Yesterday, a staff member of Senator Angus King told me I should be sure to watch his U.S. Senate floor speech (text here), that I would be impressed.

    I am not impressed in the slightest. Why?

    1) King takes to the floor, draping the mantle of Margaret Chase Smith about his shoulders as if he’s saying something shockingly similarly new and revelatory as what MCS said decades ago. But what he says in the speech, people have been saying for *months*.

    2) King declares correctly that “we in this body, at least thus far, are inert—and therefore complicit.” But his speech does not remedy this. He never commits to actually doing anything about the situation. He never uses the words “I will” or their equivalent.

    3) The closest he comes to suggesting action is the indirect, subjunctive, and passive suggestion about what that members of Congress could do:

    “We could reclaim our power, however, by pulling back the trade authority (there’s a bill to do that), instituting vigorous oversight of the activities of DOGE to determine to what extent their actions compromise congressional intent, or holding the President’s nominees and his prized tax bill until he ceases his attempts to make policy unilaterally, including impounding congressionally authorized and appropriated funds. You know, do our job.”

    That’s some snappy rhetoric. But regarding these three hypothetical suggestions for action, Senator King is fully aware that the trade authority bill will not pass due to the Republican majority, and that the Republicans will not institute vigorous oversight over DOGE. So the first two ideas are empty of possibility, leaving only the third left.

    The third item, blocking the progress of the President’s nominees and legislative agenda, is available to Senator King NOW. No coalition-building is necessary. He can slow Senate progress on implementing Trump’s dictatorship NOW, simply by withholding the unanimous consent that makes the Senate work quickly. In an instant, the GOP Senate agenda would progress at a tenth of the current pace. When Republicans were in the minority, they pulled this tactic all the time and extracted all kinds of concessions from the majority as a result.

    It’s what King says someone ought to do in his speech — but while he talks big, in practice Senator King is refusing to do it. He has been asked by citizens and pro-democracy groups to block the progress of the Trump agenda in the Senate for months, but he has refused to act in the manner of his speech.

    I can’t tell you yet what he did yesterday, because the Congressional Record for April 29 hasn’t been released yet. But the Congressional Record for April 28 is available right here. Read it. You will find:

    * 27 times during the floor business of the Senate on April 28, the unanimous consent of the Senate to proceed on 27 different items on the agenda was solicited, with just one Senator’s objection required to slow the agenda down. Senator Angus King failed to object to unanimous consent every single time.

    * There was a roll call vote April 28 on the nomination of David Perdue to be U.S. Ambassador to China. Not only did Senator King fail to withhold unanimous consent to proceed with the vote, but when the vote came, he cast a “YEA” vote to end debate on the nomination — not to slow down or hold the nomination, but to speed it up.

    While King talks tough, in action he fits his own accusation: “inert—and therefore complicit.”

    While pregnant mothers are dying at twice the rate in states where abortion has been banned,

    while students who have broken no law have had their visas revoked,

    while people have been hauled to torturous overseas concentration camps without the due process guaranteed to them,

    while citizens are being deported, also without due process,

    while the protections of the Constitution are being stripped away more and more by the day,

    and while everyday citizens are taking to streetcorners to declare their public opposition at an increasing risk to themselves…

    … Senator Angus King is delivering yet another empty speech and sitting on his hands. King is failing to take the actions available to him to stop it, or even to slow the process down.

    So no, Senator King, I am not amazed by your speech. I am galled by the temerity with which you are daily failing us in your actions.

    You have the power within you to do better, to do something, Angus King, and the future of our country relies on it.

    Senator Angus King: All Talk, No Action
  • Testifying Through Presence: Handmaids at the Maine State House

    Testifying Through Presence: Handmaids at the Maine State House

    On Friday March 28 of 2025, members of the theater group of The Audacity traveled from their various home towns of the midcoast to the Maine State House in Augusta, donned the red robes and white bonnets that visually refer to Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, and stood outside the hearing room where the Judiciary Committee of the Maine State Legislature received testimony regarding L.D. 975 and other bills that would outlaw and criminalize abortion in the state of Maine. The visual testimony of this group augmented the written transcript of testimony by 34 members of The Audacity submitted to the public record for the same hearing. Multiple members of the theater group had lived through a time in American history during which abortion had been criminalized and women punished for making choices about their own bodies.

    Protesters from Midcoast Maine assemble at the Maine State Legislature outside the hearing on bills that would criminalize abortion in the State of Maine -- Friday, March 28 2025

    Participant Lisa Kushner arrived alone:

    “I attended that event dressed in a red costume. When I walked up outside the statehouse there were 2 small groups of people, anti abortion Christians and pro abortion supporters. Those against the bills were loudly chanting slogans like ‘my body my choice’. There were more young people than I’d seen at other demonstrations. I joined another red cloaked person who was there on her own. I was looking for The Audacity group but didn’t know where they were meeting up.

    After about 15 minutes the red cloaked white bonnet maidens came from the Cross building in single file through both groups of protesters. A silence occurred. It was a dramatic moment.

    The red tape covering their mouths was really effective.”

    Nancy Davis describes the day:

    “I was part of the handmaid‘s group who went to Augusta on Friday. We met outside the Cross  building a little after nine, finished getting our red outfits on and strolled through the building to the capital. We were a big stand out in the crowd as we approach the capital building. Lots of people took our picture and news crews filmed us entering the building. unfortunately, the hearing was in a small room and couldn’t accommodate groups of people. People who wished to speak, had to sign in, declare if they were in favor or opposed to the law and wait their turn to speak one by one. Of course they chose the people who were opposed to abortion go first. So we stood for a couple of hours waiting and still realized we had a long time to go so most people left to go home. Three of us were interviewed by Channel 8 news. However, I watched, and unfortunately, only one of us was quoted and in just a few words. I was the only one filmed in the story, although the two women with me were much more articulate than I.”

    Kimberly Krejsa adds:

    “We gathered together in a cold, windy parking garage.  Looking furtively around, we quickly put on our disguises; red gowns, white bonnets. Briskly, we walked to the rendezvous point, gathering more maidens as we approached the government building.  Protesters gathered outside, yelling and chanting at each other; cameras were turned in our direction as we solemnly walked into the building.  We were recognized and warmly greeted by several folks.  We could hear people murmuring about our costumes as we walked about, silently protesting the extremity of these 7 bills.  People signed up to argue their case, one by one, in front of the legislative committee.  Passions were high, arguments were eloquent and the committee was patient and kind.  Everyone had a chance to speak if they did not mind waiting for hours.  Some of the personal testimony was heart-breaking as people shared their personal stories.  It was good trouble.”

    Seven members of The Audacity dressed as Atwood Handmaids in front of the legislative hearing room in which bills proposing to criminalize abortion and otherwise restrict it were being considered.  Date: March 28 2025.

    Cynthia Stancioff concludes:

    “We were sort of struggling with costumes in the wind, not all that unified in appearance, and without any choreography of our movements. So I think we looked like a small group of distinctly-dressed, mostly-old ladies (one childbearing age person among us), there to make an impression – but doing nothing in particular. It was clear some people recognized the trope, but there wasn’t news coverage as far as I could tell, so we impressed a hundred people or so? Maybe I missed a tv camera or something though.


    “I felt like we needed some plan (marching orders, as it were) of how to walk around, like single file, heads down, – didn’t have to be fancy to be dramatic, but we didn’t take advantage of the theatrical possibilities! A fair number of people did take pictures of us, and we met with only approval, no opposition that I could see.”

  • Follow Senators’ Evolving Positions on a Continuing Resolution with this Google Doc

    Follow Senators’ Evolving Positions on a Continuing Resolution with this Google Doc

    — March 14, 2025

    The United States Senate has received a bill from the Republican-controlled House of Representatives that Republican leadership pushed through without any consultation with or inclusion of Democratic members of Congress. The bill, contains a wave of disastrous changes, and yet a shocking number of Democratic Party Senators are indicating their inclination to vote for the bill, under the theory that if they appease Donald Trump and don’t make him angry, he might not act as tyrannically as if they stood up to him.

    What you need to know:

    Angus King is leaning Yes on March 14, 2025 to vote for a Continuing Resolution, despite what he said earlier about the importance of not appeasing Donald Trump's unilateral budget cutting threats

    As independent media analysis and the office of Senator Bernie Sanders report, the bill would if passed:

    • Cut more than $20 billion in funding needed to provide health care for veterans who were injured during their time in the military;
    • Pave the way for the Trump administration to slash funding for teachers, schools, student loans, and Pell grants for low-income young adults seeking to improve their lives through college education;
    • Cut funding for community health centers (where the most poor and desperate Americans go for health care) by 3.2%;
    • Cut the National Health Service Corps, which brings doctors, nurses, dentists, and midwives to regions of our nation with the greatest shortages, by more than 5%;
    • Cut funding for Teaching Health Centers — a program which establishes and runs residency programs for health care practitioners in rural and underserved areas — by almost 13%;
    • Cut rental assistance to keep struggling low-income families in their homes, preventing the more expensive disaster of eviction and homelessness, by $700 million;
    • Cut spending to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons by $185 million’
    • Allow the Trump Administration to spend as little as it wants to confront the ongoing disasters caused by climate change, and cutting $1.4 billion from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ budget for projects to help hurricane- and flood-struck areas;
    • Pave the way for $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid;
    • Cut $230 billion from nutrition programs for hungry children that help them grow up to be strong and capable citizens as adults;
    • Eliminate funding for programs that ensure election security;
    • Cut rural internet broadband infrastructure by $30 million;
    • Let the FEMA budget run empty as new climate disasters unfold by the week;
    • End Congress’ constitutional ability to control tariffs through legislation;
    • Use these cuts to programs that help struggling Americans to pay for a tax cut for billionaires and the wealthiest 1% of Americans by $1.1 trillion;
    • Increase military spending, including in areas that involve lucrative new contracts for private corporations;
    • Increase spending by $485 million for ICE agents to rip immigrants from their home and send them to camps where they have no access to legal help and are humiliated, beaten, and even tortured.

    Call Senator Angus King’s office if you have a position on this bill. His phone numbers:

    AUGUSTA
    Phone: (207) 622-8292

    BANGOR
    Phone: (207) 945-8000

    BIDDEFORD
    Phone: (207) 352-5216

    PORTLAND
    Phone: (207) 245-1565

    PRESQUE ISLE
    Phone: (207) 764-5124

    WASHINGTON, D.C.
    Phone: (202) 224-5344

  • Testimony at Rockland City Council on The Dangers of Police Cooperation with ICE

    The following is a video record of the testimony of of Abi Morrison, Annegien Zuidema, and Peter Yanz to the Rockland City Council in Maine on March 10, 2025. Video credit: Marjorie Strauss. Transcript follows.


    You have a choice: a choice between words and actions.

    The resolution affirming community trust and clarifying law enforcement responsibilities claims that Rockland police will not participate in targeting people based on immigration status. But this council has already taken federal money, the Operation Stonegarden Grant funds, and those will compel our law enforcement officers to do exactly that.

    On January 29, 2025 the president signed S. 5 into law. Under this law, anyone merely suspected of being undocumented can be detained, and also if they are also just suspected of having committed a crime. There is no conviction necessary; there is no judicial review. Anyone who isn’t white is at risk. Once detained, they disappear into a system with no transparency and no oversight. Families don’t know where their loved ones are. They don’t know if they will ever see them again.

    And now, for the first time in history, our government is using Guantanamo Bay to detail immigrants who were apprehended here, on U.S. soil. This is completely unprecedented, it is completely illegal, and it is happening now. The administration refuses to provide notices of transfer. Detainees are living in daily fear of being moved without warning, without reason, and without recourse. They are cut off from their family, cut off from their attorneys, literally cut off from hope.

    And this is what we do know about conditions at Guantanamo Bay thanks to an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit: detainees are confined in solitary, windowless cells for at least 23 hours each day. Detainees are allowed extremely limited time outside their cells. They are constantly shackled and invasively strip-searched. They are never permitted to contact family members.

    Guards engage in verbal and physical abuse including restraining people to a punishment chair for hours, withholding water as retaliation, threatening to shoot detainees, fracturing an individual’s hand by slamming a radio into it. People are losing 10-20 pounds over the span of several weeks. They can’t sleep because of what they’ve endured there. These degrading conditions and extreme isolation have led to several suicide attempts as well.

    People are getting picked up who have a green card, who are here legally. This isn’t some far-away injustice. This is here and now. The rate at which Customs and Border Patrol are picking up people doubled just in January.

    The council can’t have it both ways. It can’t claim to stand for justice with a resolution while taking money from a system that is based on cruelty. If we are going to truly stand by this resolution, then we have to act. We have to return the Operation Stonegarden grant before the new fiscal year. If we don’t, this blood is on your hands.

  • Proposed Abortion Ban Summary

    Proposed Abortion Ban Summary

    On Friday, H.P. 635 was presented to the Maine Committee on Judiciary. If made law, this bill would end abortion in Maine. As presently written, this bill proposes the following:


    1. Repeals the authority of District Court to grant the right to an abortion to a minor.


    2. Redefines “Reproductive Healthcare Services” in 14 MRSA 9002 to exclude abortion.


    3. Repeals the crime of Elevated Aggravated Assault Upon A Pregnant Person in 17-A MRSA 208-C. Presumably, this is specifically to allow for prosecution of abortion providers, which are called out in MRSA Title 17‑A, section 208-C as being exempt from this law.


    4. Repeals the crime of Domestic Violence Elevated Aggravated Assault Upon A Pregnant Person in 17-A MRSA 208-F. The assumed motivation here is to make it more likely pregnant people get assaulted.


    5. Removes Elevated Aggravated Assault and Domestic Violence Elevated Aggravated Assault from the list of prior convictions that will elevate any subsequent charges for Domestic Violence, Domestic Terrorizing, Domestic Violence Stalking, and Domestic Violence Reckless Conduct from a misdemeanor to a felony.


    6. Repeals the authority of police to arrest suspected domestic abusers of pregnant people under the Domestic Violence Elevated Aggravated Assault and Elevated Aggravated Assault Upon a Pregnant Person statutes, which are to be repealed.


    7. Allows the Maternal, Fetal, and Infant Mortality Review Panel to keep medical records of all citizens’ abortions. Currently, retaining these records is illegal.


    8. Prohibits the Department of Health from considering abortion access when permitting new medical facilities.


    9. Repeals 22 MRSA 263-B, which details a citizen’s abortion rights and medical providers’ responsibilities.


    10.Requires all miscarriages to be reported to the state by our healthcare providers within 10 days of the miscarriage.


    11.Removes abortion care from any Medicaid recipients’ coverage.


    12.Removes confidentiality protections for abortion providers, so that the Department of Health would be required to provide a list of abortion providers to any citizen that requests the list.


    13.Disallows an organization’s non-profit status if the organization performs abortions.


    14.Ends the requirement for insurers operating in Maine to provide coverage for abortion.

    Click here to read the source document H.P. 635, titled “An Act to Repeal Laws Allowing Abortion and to Criminalize
    Abortion.”